The man charged with killing Charlie Kirk shouldn’t get the death penalty because the shooter “hit the intended target” and no one else was endangered, his lawyers said.
Defense in Charlie Kirk’s killing say shooter should not get death penalty, hit ‘intended target’
Related Posts
-
Iowa Republicans’ legislative majorities shrink in 2026 elections
Iowa Republicans kept control of both chambers, but their legislative majorities shrank after Tuesday’s election…
-
The 2028 election season begins as both parties navigate midterm fallout
The final midterm votes are still being counted, but make no mistake: The next election…
-
GOP House member says he will trigger impeachment vote against Defense Secretary Hegseth
The House could vote as soon as next week to impeach the Pentagon’s top leader.
-
New study links energy drinks to reports of heart attacks and cardiac arrest in young adults
A cardiologist recommends moderation as well as healthier options after new research raises concerns about…
Leave a Reply